Description
Mouse 3 Chamber CPP |
Three chambers |
Contextual plates: White; black; striped |
2 dual control shock grids |
2 dual control lights |
(Optional addon) Sound |
Rat 3 Chamber CPP |
Three chambers |
Contextual plates: White; black; striped |
2 dual control shock grids |
2 dual control lights |
(Optional addon) Sound |
Features
- Compartment Width: 10 cm
- Compartment Length: 13cm
- Compartment Height: 13 cm
- Corridor Width: 7.5cm
- Corridor Depth: 7.5 cm
- Corridor Height: 13 cm
- Door Width: 6 cm
- Door Height: 6 cm
- Compartment Width: 30 cm
- Compartment Length: 30 cm
- Compartment Height: 34 cm
- Corridor Width: 8 cm
- Corridor Depth: 16 cm
- Corridor Height: 34 cm
- Door Width: 10 cm
- Door Height: 14 cm

Introduction
The Automated Conditioned Place Preference Apparatus is an advanced adaptation of the traditional Conditioned Place Preference Test. This automated version enhances the standard setup with features such as infrared detection, separate controls for lighting, and independent shock grid management. The apparatus includes two equally sized acrylic compartments linked by a central corridor.
The Conditioned Place Preference Test is used to evaluate the rewarding and aversive effects of substances. Initially, rodentsā preference for one compartment over the other is assessed by recording the time spent in each compartment during a pre-conditioning phase. In the subsequent conditioning phase, the preferred compartment is associated with a control substance (e.g., saline), while the non-preferred compartment is paired with the drug. Rodents receive injections of either saline or the drug and are then confined to the corresponding compartment on alternate days. The post-conditioning phase, which mirrors the pre-conditioning phase but without drug or saline injections, assesses whether the rodentās initial compartment preference has shifted due to conditioning. Each compartment features unique cues, helping animals link these cues with the reinforcer (Prus, James, & Rosecrans, 2009).
The Automated Conditioned Place Preference Apparatus is designed with independently controlled lights in both chambers to act as cues. The compartments can be equipped with interchangeable acrylic plates in white, black, or striped patterns to provide varied contexts. Additionally, each compartment includes a removable shock grid for administering shocks, which can be used as a form of reinforcement.
Apparatus and Equipment
The Automated Conditioned Place Preference Apparatus features three acrylic compartments: two larger experimental chambers connected by a smaller central corridor. A clear, removable acrylic cover encases all three compartments.
The system includes interchangeable contextual plates in white, black, and striped patterns, along with two sets of independently controlled lights and shock grids. The removable shock grids can deliver currents ranging from 0.1 to 4.0 mA in 0.1 mA increments. Advanced infrared sensor mechanisms between the compartments enable automated detection and counting, complementing video tracking systems like the Noldus EthoVision XT. Each chamber operates autonomously, managing its own light, shock, and animal location detection functions.
Additionally, Conduct Science provides optional speakers for sound cues that can be installed in the experimental chambers. Automated guillotine doors can also be added upon request.
Training Protocol
Thoroughly clean all compartments and bottom trays with isopropyl alcohol (70%) and dry them with a paper towel before each trial.
The following is a sample protocol to study conditioned place preference in rodents:
Literature Review
Data Analysis
The following parameters can be observed using the Automated Conditioned Place Preference Apparatus:
- The time the subject spent in each compartment during the pre-conditioning phase
- The distance the subject traveled in each compartment in the pre-conditioning phase.
- The time the subject spent in each compartment during the post-conditioning phase
- The distance the subject traveled in each compartment in the post-conditioning phase.
- The locomotor activity of the subject during the conditioning phase.
Strengths and Limitations
Summary
- The Automated Conditioned Place Preference Apparatus is an adapted version of the Conditioned Place Preference Test.
- The apparatus comprises two equal-sized acrylic compartments interconnected by a smaller central corridor. It includes automated IR detection, independent light controls, and independent shock grid controls.
- The apparatus is available with removable white, black, and striped acrylic contextual plates.
- The Automated Conditioned Place Preference Apparatus makes the conditioned place preference protocol easier and less time-consuming.
- It can be used to examine the rewarding and aversive effects of drugs and in studies investigating drug relapse.
References
- Prus, A. J., James, J. R., & Rosecrans, J. A. (2009).Ā Conditioned Place Preference. In J. J. Buccafusco (Ed.),Ā Methods of Behavior Analysis in Neuroscience. (2nd ed.). CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.
- Ebrahimian, F., Naghavi, F. S., Yazdi, F., Sadeghzadeh, F., Taslimi, Z., & Haghparast, A. (2016).Ā Differential roles of orexin receptors within the dentate gyrus in stress- and drug priming-induced reinstatement of conditioned place preference in rats.Ā Behavioral neuroscience,Ā 130(1), 91ā102. https://doi.org/10.1037/bne0000112
- Niikura, K., Ho, A., Kreek, M. J., & Zhang, Y. (2013).Ā Oxycodone-induced conditioned place preference and sensitization of locomotor activity in adolescent and adult mice.Ā Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior,Ā 110, 112ā116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2013.06.010